An investigation into how Paterson was entitled to £216,000 in legal aid despite his apparent net worth was announced in September 2018. This was followed by a Freedom of Information request from the Daily Mail, which revealed that it dwarfed the amount of compensation for most of his victims – around £50,000 on average – and the revelation that he had a vast property empire in Britain and Florida. Over the past 12 months, a leading law firm specializing in medical negligence has seen hundreds of former patients of disgraced breast surgeon Ian Paterson turn to it for legal support — and not just for inappropriate breast surgeries, for which he is notorious. Ann Butler, chair of the Breast Cancer Support Group, told the Mail in 2018: “I don`t think he should have gotten legal help. That`s a disgusting sum, considering the five-figure compensation given to many of his victims. This makes me very angry and disappointed with the British judicial system. A renegade surgeon who mutilated hundreds of women must repay more than £216,000 in legal aid. In 2021, a new fund will be created that will allow thousands more potential victims of the convicted breast surgeon to seek compensation for the negligence suffered. Spire will provide a substantial sum to respond to these claims.

Thompsons` medical negligence lawyers negotiated the Paterson Trust`s terms in 2017 following the conclusion of their successful lawsuit against Paterson. Thompsons will once again leverage its cutting-edge expertise in Paterson case management to support those who have received a reminder letter from Spire through the new fund. Former Paterson patients can avoid additional attorney fees charged by other attorneys by filing a claim directly with the fund. If you are a former Ian Paterson patient, contact our leading Paterson experts below. Hundreds of cancer survivors in the Birmingham area are being asked to consult a lawyer after undergoing a “controversial” mastectomy performed by Ian Paterson. Sources said legal aid applications are subject to assessments of an individual`s finances, including credit checking agencies and HM Land Registry. Renegade surgeon Ian Paterson must repay £216,000 in legal aid he received at his trial for shooting patients, it was announced last night. “We have already seen over 200 additional patients receive legal support following the reopening of the Paterson Trust, but given the scale of the recall in the thousands, we expect the actual number of patients who could have a court case to be much higher. Slater and Gordon`s medical negligence lawyers specialise in claims against the NHS, GPs, private doctors and hospitals arising from medical treatment neglect and act on behalf of injured victims. If you are concerned and require legal advice, please contact one of our medical negligence specialists. At the time of the Mail`s 2018 report on its legal aid law, the Justice Department said officials wanted to determine whether the doctor “intentionally transferred assets to qualify for legal aid.” Maria Panteli, a medical negligence attorney who represents Paterson victims but is not affected by the deal, urged Spire to flout the deal so patients can choose their legal representation based on their experience and expertise. It seems fundamental to us that patient safety comes first, whether a person is treated privately or in the NHS.

Our “Patients before Profits – Justice for Victims by Ian Paterson” campaign will ensure that the same legal standards of protection and safety apply wherever people are treated and procedures are followed. Home » Case Studies » Compensation for Patients Treated by Breast Surgeon Ian Paterson Newsroom > >Ian Paterson`s Home: What You Need to Know It has been suggested that Paterson performed these procedures for status and financial gain. Because not enough tissue was removed during the first surgery, patients may have had to return for other procedures, with some apparently returning to surgery multiple times. It has also been suggested that Paterson exaggerated the cancer risk for some patients to perform surgery on them when it turns out that patients may not have been at risk of the devastating disease at all. The guidelines state that you should remove 98% of the breast tissue during a mastectomy to have the best chance of successfully stopping the cancer. Paterson, however, left too much tissue in a seemingly experimental and unrecognized procedure later identified as a “cleft-sparing mastectomy” (CSM), which could significantly increase patients` risk of cancer returning. In 2015, the Scottish-born surgeon bought a three-bedroom condo in Florida, which he still owned in 2018. According to Manatee County property records, Paterson, 62, owned the house with his twin daughters. It was valued at £107,000 two years ago. Linda Millband, National Manager of Clinical Negligence Practice at Thompsons Solicitors It wasn`t until 2007, when a new surgeon was appointed alongside Paterson, that further concerns were raised. The new breast surgeon, Hemant Ingle, checked some of Paterson`s patients and noticed the abundance of cancerous tissue in previous cases.

M. Paterson is accused of performing invasive breast surgery on women suspected of having breast cancer, when a simple biopsy could have sufficed. He also allegedly performed lumpectomies and lymph node removal on at-risk patients when it was not necessary to do so. It was reported that a 2017 settlement prevented victims of breast surgeon Ian Paterson from using the 40 law firms involved in the original claims because they had been prevented from making further claims against Spire Healthcare for 20 years.